Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Constructionism, Technology, and the Classroom

This week we took a look at the constructionist learning theory which suggests that the best learning happens when learners are engaged in the construction of a physical artifact that can be shared with others (Orey, 2001). This artifact can be anything from a written or typed paper to model of the solar system.

In looking at the instructional strategy of "generating and testing hypotheses" as presented in chapter nine of Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works, it is evident that constructionism is a tremendously valid theory to support this strategy (Pitler, Hubbell, & Kuhn, 2012). The first thing that came to my mind when I read this chapter, was the strategy that we use for science. SWH or Science Writing Heuristic approach engages students to act and think more like scientists. The SWH approach was actually developed in 1998 at the University of Iowa, a mere hour and twenty minutes from my front door. Here is a quick video introduction to the SWH approach.

I do not teach science, but I could in the future. I am working with the other fifth grade teacher who has had this training to learn more about how to conduct the claims and evidence. Students make their claims about a certain topic, and then find evidence to support their claims. What may happen is the assimilation and accomodation that Dr. Orey discussed in the media segment about the mechanisms for learning in the constructionist theory. Students may find that the schema that they posses is supported by their research, or they may find that their schema must be altered based upon what they have discovered.
Currently, our science teacher has students do their claims and evidence using large poster paper and their science notebooks. It would be very easy to use organizing and brainstorming software that was discussed in the text (Pitler, et al., 2012). For example, the organizers they mentioned, kidspiration or inspiration could be a great tool to organize their research. They could also use spiderscribe.net, which is the tool I used last week for my concept map, and I loved it.
In summary, there are so many great ways to allow students to really take charge of their own learning. By using the constructionist theory as well as an approach like generating and testing hypothesis, students really get a chance to pull in and make connections like never before. Technology offers those tools that will allow students to grow in their knowledge, understanding, and creativity like never before.
Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Constructionist and constructivist learning theories [Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using technology with classroom instruction that works (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 

University of Iowa College of Education. (2014, May 6). The Science Writing Heuristic Approach [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vaA-Nt_Ahc.


7 comments:

  1. Amber,
    I really enjoyed reading and watching the video about The SWH. I have never heard of this before and found it very interesting...especially since I teach science. I would love to research this more and possibly even do some training as you spoke of.
    Thanks so much for sharing. As always, I enjoyed your post!
    Jessica Burnette
    3rd Grade - Math / Science
    Woodruff, SC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jessica,
      I could see you as a math and science teacher benefiting greatly from this type of model! Do you have a current curriculum for science? Or are you building your own based upon the core?
      Amber

      Delete
  2. Amber,

    Thank you for sharing the information of SWH in the video! I have heard of it but never fully understood until watching your post. I also love how you used the existing tools being used in the classroom and found a way to integrate technology into making the lesson more efficient. I love using kidspiration with my class as well. Finding all these avenues for children to construct their own discovery using technology allows teachers and students to work smarter, not harder. The access to information using technology is infinite! Thanks for the great post!

    Rebecca

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rebecca,
      Thank your for your comments! I agree with the work smarter, not harder comment! I think something teachers should also consider is to allow students to explore the technology resources out there. They can probably discover resources that we as teachers don't even know exist! Or, they can surely figure out ways to use current technologies in ways that we can't even fathom.
      Amber

      Delete
  3. Amber,

    I really liked the video of SWH that you shared in your post. I think there are many components that are similar to the Genius Hour that I posted about. I agree that getting out students more involved and to "act like scientists" will result in higher learning. Developing questions and conducing experiments and research to the find the answers makes learning more meaningful and is more likely to be retained. Thanks for sharing!

    -Erin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree, Erin! I think I may have left a similar comment on your blog! Learning by doing is always a great way to go! How do kids learn to ride a bike? By reading about it in a book or being told how they should do it? No way! They suit up and hop on that bike! Just like you said, if they want to learn about science, they should "act like scientists"!
      Amber

      Delete
  4. Amber,
    Nice use of foundation educational strategy with the SWH. I think with the use of this tool students would enjoy participating in the educational practice that exists in science. This learning exercise allows students to transition from student to "scientist" and a level of professional respect I feel comes with the term "being a scientist." I'm sure the students would enjoy having their work presented as if they were actually scientists. Great tool!

    ReplyDelete